It is pretty clear that seralini is antigmo, and this likely biased his research. The print is a delhibased, online news magazine that began operations in august 2017. The new editor over at the journal, food and chemical toxicology. The infamous seralini cornroundup study with rats and. Profile of gilleseric seralini, author of republished. That was the whole basis of the sensational 2012 paper that actually resulted in entire african countries rejecting all gmo imports.
Andrew revkin wrote in a blog the study was another instance of single study syndrome, and that the study was in support of an agenda. It was not intended to be a cancer study, but the rats got cancer and they got cancer at a very young age, and the results had to be published and then republished for the public to know, despite monsantos blatant attempts to cover them up for nearly a decade. It did indeed find toxicity in both roundup and gm maize, as well as an increase in. Republication of seralini study exposes roundup mother. Seralini ge, clair e, mesnage r, gress s, defarge n, malatesta m, et al. Nov 30, 20 by daisy luther remember the seralini study, with those gruesome images of gmofed rats that were engulfed by horrific tumors. Seralini study withdrawn should never have been published. Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats. Jun 24, 2014 however, in a longterm study, evidence of early liver aging was observed infemale mice fed with rtolerant gm soy. This is the way science moves forward and here we provide a response to this intense debate. Controversial french scientist defends gmo research. Secret documents connect monsanto to retracting seralini gmo report a trove of internal documents from monsanto, recently unsealed in a lawsuit against the agricultural biotech giant, has revealed the firms role in the knotty tale of a paper from the lab of a scientist known for his stance against genetically modified organisms gmos. Zombie retracted seralini gmo maize rat study republished to.
Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats is. Silly us, there was absolutely nothing to worry about. The study in question the study we are discussing was supervised by gilleseric seralini, a french molecular biologist who carried out an experiment on spraguedawley rats. Paper on link between gm corn and cancer in lab rats is republished after.
Criticism of the seralini study has been rebutted by many, including the seralini group itself. A controversial retracted study on the toxicology of genetically modified corn and pesticide has been republished in a new journal. You can grab yourself some gmo corn and chow down now because the journal that published the study has retracted it. On june 24, the retracted study, in expanded form, this time including the data, was republished with the tile republished study. Ten things you need to know about the seralini study gmo. There were 200 albino spraguedawley, 100 males and 100 females. But regardless, the study methodology is terrible and the results worthless. Sep 22, 2017 claire robinson reports that internal monsanto documents released by attorneys leading us cancer litigation show that monsanto attempted to suppress a study showing adverse effects of roundup herbicide. Jun 24, 2014 the new rat corn study by gilleseric seralini looks a lot like the old retracted one, according to a detailed analysis by the genetic literacy project. Hundreds of scientists tell the world that the gmo. On june 24, 2014, the retracted study, in expanded form was republished with the tile republished study. The industry funding behind antigmo activist gilleseric. Elsevier has announced that they are retracting the infamous seralini study which claimed to show that gmo corn causes cancer in laboratory rats. Altogether, the significant biochemical disturbances and physi ological failures documented in this work confirm the pathological effects of these gmo and r.
Jun 25, 2014 a controversial retracted study on the toxicology of genetically modified corn and pesticide has been republished in a new journal. Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats is republished. Jun 24, 2014 paper claiming gm link with tumours republished. Scientists smell a rat in fraudulent seralini gmo study.
The study was first published in food and chemical toxicology fct in september 2012 but was retracted by the editorinchief in november 20 after a sustained campaign of criticism and defamation by progmo scientists. Winfried schroder, an editor at eseu, commented on the journals decision to republish seralinis study. First published by food and chemical toxicology in september 2012, the article presented a twoyear feeding study in rats, and reported an increase in tumors among rats fed genetically modified corn and the herbicide roundup. The study was first published in food and chemical toxicology fct in september 20121 but was retracted by the editorinchief in november 20 after a sustained campaign of criticism and defamation by progmo scientists. Jun 24, 2014 gilleseric seralini has republished his retracted study of herbicide resistant gmo maize and glyphosate in an obscure european open source journal.
Seralinis study was unethical, poorlydone, and ideologically motivated. In the present investigation, deeper analysis at an ultrastructural levelrevealed evidence of impediments in transcription and other defects in cell nuclearstructure that were comparable in both sexes and dosedependent in. Consequently, the study itself was republished in 2014 16 in environmental sciences europe. Researchers studied the effects of the gmo maize for two years in rats. In an announcement made today in france, the seralini study on the long term effects of gmos and glyphosate has been republished in the springer open source journal environmental sciences europe eseu, 2014, 26. It was immediately embraced by antigmo activists, and continues to be often cited as evidence that gmo foods are unhealthy. Most criticisms of seralinis study wrongly assume it was a badly designed cancer study. Commonly referred to as the seralini study, it is the. The seralini study suffers from small sample size, lack of statistical analysis, ambiguous results, a questionable selection of rat strain which maximizes noise in the data, and dubious ethical treatment of the animals for possible dramatic effect. In june 2014, the original study was republished with the addition of the entire data set, in the journal environmental sciences europe.
Gilleseric seralini is a french scientist who has been a professor of molecular biology at the university of caen since 1991. Just before the gardener dewayne johnsons historic trial of june 18, 2018 may 24 and june 12, and then on january 30, 2019, and in a second cancer patient trial, thirteen of the multinationals lawyers put their full persuasion in compelling letters to the court, enjoining them to exclude from the debates any mention, argument or. Miller and bruce chassy as published by forbes magazine last week french microbiologist gilleseric seralini and his colleagues released the results of a longterm study in which rats were fed genetically engineered aka genetically modified, gm corn that contains enhanced. Jul 03, 2014 the republished study is accompanied by a separate commentary by prof seralinis team describing the lobbying efforts of gmo crop supporters to force the editor of fct to retract the original. In 2012, a study was published in food and chemical toxicology by seralini et al. Seralinis study is the only longterm study on the commercialized gm maize nk603 and the pesticide roundup it is designed to be grown with. The goal of seralini s study was to measure the effects of feeding rats roundup resistant nkg603 gm maize and roundup over a 2year period. Moreover, the longterm effects of roundup identified in the original study administered over a 2. Gilleseric seralini has republished his retracted study of herbicide resistant gmo maize and glyphosate in an obscure european open source journal.
Most of these studies are 90days trials that compare rodents fed gm food to a control group see hammond et al. He is known for his controversial research concluding that. Jun 25, 2014 fcc commissioner warns of agencys plan to monitor newsrooms study. Seralinis study was a welldesigned and wellconducted chronic toxicity study. We have republished our study, which was retracted because of dishonesty of the system, he said. The study randomly assigned 100 male and 100 female spraguedawley rats to ten different groups.
Gmo rat study retractedby new journal editor from surprise. The study by prof seralini is the first long term feeding trial with this particular variety of roundup tolerant gm maize, fed at three different doses. Seralini study withdrawn should never have been published that abysmal seralini study of rats fed on gmo grain is at last being withdrawn by its publisher. On 25 november 2015, the high court of paris indicted marc fellous, former chairman of frances biomolecular engineering commission, for forgery and the use of forgery, in a libel trial that he lost to prof gilleseric seralini. It was also immediately skewered by skeptics and more objective scientists as a fatally flawed study. A study on genetically modified gmo maize, first published two years ago and retracted a year later, has been republished. The biomolecular engineering commission has authorised many gm crops for consumption. Secret documents connect monsanto to retracting seralini. Miller, in an opinion piece for forbes, said seralini has crossed the line from merely performing and reporting flawed experiments to committing gross scientific misconduct and attempting. Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites. Longterm toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a rounduptolerant genetically modified maize. The retraction comes one year after the paper was published, and seems to be a response to the avalanche of criticism the study has faced. The seralini gmo study retraction and response to critics. Republication of the infamous seralini study on the toxicity of gm corn has been met with renewed criticism from the scientific community.
The reason given for the withdrawal is that the study does not show rats get cancer from being fed gmo food. Many scientists have denounced the republication of a retracted study by gilleseric seralini and colleagues that linked genetically modified gm maize corn to. That abysmal seralini study of rats fed on gmo grain is at last being withdrawn by its publisher. Numerous studies of laboratory animals fed gm foods have found no evidence of risks to human health efsa gmo panel working group on animal feeding trials 2008. Controversial gm study republished experts respond. This study represents the first detailed documentation of long term deleterious effects arising from the consumption of a gm r tolerant maize and of r, the most used herbicide worldwide. The study, led by gilleseric seralini, looked at the effects of roundup, the glyphosatebased herbicide, and a gmo maize variety called nk603. The seralini paper was published in november 2012 in food and chemical toxicology. The study was designed to test for toxicity and followed the same oecdapproved protocols that monsanto had used in their trials, except that it lasted for two years instead of the usual 90 days. In june 2014 the text of the article was republished in environmental sciences europe. Jun 27, 2014 criticism of the seralini study has been rebutted by many, including the seralini group itself.
This retraction is to the antigmo world what the retraction of the infamous wakefield. Science speaks for itself help us reduce the maintenance cost of our online services. Gmo seralini is a onestop resource for information about the research of gilleseric seralini and colleagues on genetically modified foods and roundup. Examining environmental sciences europe, journal that. Defenders of the republication cite the virtue of access to data, and open communication, while decrying the censorship of the retraction. On 9 june, it published a short article by sandya ramesh under. The seralini gmo rat study is now infamous for its poor quality and overstated conclusions. Our study is the first and to date the only attempt to follow up monsantos investigation and to determine whether the differences found in the nk603 gm maizefed rats, especially with respect to liver and kidney function, were not.
The only previous investigation with nk603 gm maize is a 90 day feeding study conducted by industry as part of its application for approval within the eu. Seralini ge, clair e, mesnage r, gress s, defarge n, malatesta m et al 2014 republished study. The study, led by prof ge seralini, showed that very low doses of monsantos roundup herbicide had toxic effects on rats. Claire robinson reports that internal monsanto documents released by attorneys leading us cancer litigation show that monsanto attempted to suppress a study showing adverse effects of roundup herbicide. Secret documents connect monsanto to retracting seralini gmo. Bad news for monsanto seralini gmo study gets new light. Reread that previous sentence because it shows the power of this one, poorlydesigned study with 120 rats. A 2014 study on us water systems across 38 states found glyphosate and its principle metabolite ampa aminomethylphosphonic acid not only in rivers, lakes and streams, but also rain, soil and sediment, ditches and drains and groundwater see 7. Junk science like this should never have been published in the first place, but better late than never marginally. Much of the criticism hinged on a distortion or more unlikely, plain ignorance of the objectives of the study, which was a toxicological study of both the frankencorn and roundup, the herbicide ubiquitously used on the corn. It was a chronic toxicity study and a welldesigned and wellconducted one. The republication of the paper extends the saga, but does nothing to correct the many failings of the study.
43 1387 3 300 794 459 1222 1459 220 1626 873 250 576 412 1 96 1056 1134 830 54 1013 268 546 971 1307 1106 544 579 933 450 480 162 493 460 281 1416 1313 516